Practice piece · Information architecture

One front door, organized around the questions people bring

One way I've brought separate data and AI guidance together behind one front door, with the two disciplines side by side instead of blended. Shown through an invented transit agency.

In shortWhen guidance lives on two sites, people have to guess which one holds the answer. This piece shows one way I've merged them: map everything, sort it by the questions people bring, and pair the two disciplines instead of blending them. It's an approach that has worked for me, not the only way to do it. The organization in it is invented.

Reading as
Approach
Current-state map, crosswalk, paired architecture
Example
Fernlow Regional Transit, an invented transit agency
Practised in
Enterprise intranet and knowledge-hub work
Try it · find the guidanceinvented menus

Find the rules for using AI with rider data. There's a data part and an AI part. Try the old sites first, then the front door.

Shaped like a two-attempt tree test, menus only. The menus are invented, so your clicks illustrate the idea; they aren't usability data.

    data rulesAI rules0 clicks

    Fernlow Regional Transit and its menus are invented. Nothing you click leaves this page.

    The crosswalk

    I map everything before merging anything

    A starting point I've often met: data guidance and AI guidance on two sites, each structured its own way.

    Why it matters · an illustrative example

    Someone at Fernlow needs the rule for using AI with rider data. They check the data office's site, then the AI group's site, then ask a colleague. One front door means one place to start.

    Two sites

    People have to know which site holds the answer

    At Fernlow, the data office's site is organized by team. The AI group's site is a tools list and an FAQ.

    inferredIn my experience, a split like this also hides how closely data rules and AI rules depend on each other.

    Current state

    Every page and section, mapped

    Before changing anything, I map every page and section on both sites as they stand.

    The crosswalk

    One shared set of categories, written as questions

    Every piece of content on both sites is mapped to the same categories. I write them as the questions people bring: where do I start, what are the rules, is my use safe, how do I learn it, where's the data, and who can help.

    A crosswalk is a table that maps every old page to its place in the new structure.

    In crosswalk terms, the dashed lines are one-to-many splits and the shaded categories are many-to-one merges.

    The merge plan

    I decide what to merge once I know what exists

    Mapping first is how I make every merge a decision, so nothing is lost or duplicated by accident when the two sites come together.

    Current state · invented sections
    Which site has the answer? every page and section mapped

    half where each half of the find-it answer lived

    Crosswalk · the same sections, mapped to the shared categories
    one section split across categoriesa category gathering several sectionsgathers from both sites: a merge decision

    Left: the invented sections from above. Right: the shared categories, written as questions. Hover, focus or tap a box to trace it.

      The structure

      Data and AI, side by side

      The structure I reached for here puts one homepage above paired data and AI pages. It's one shape among several; a single merged taxonomy is another. Pairs keep two distinct disciplines distinct.

      The homepage

      Quick links for the questions people bring

      One homepage, with a quick link for each question and a short list of what's new.

      Pairs

      Connected, and kept distinct

      Rules, safe use and skills each get a data page and an AI page side by side. inferredThe pairing shows how the two connect without merging two distinct disciplines.

      Learning paths can sit underneath, drawing on both.

      In IA terms: two parallel hierarchies, cross-linked level by level, instead of one merged taxonomy.

      Guardrails with skills

      I put the guardrails next to the skills

      A page that teaches a skill links to its safe-use page at the same level, so the guardrails arrive with the skill instead of after it.

      Reference lists

      Spreadsheets become governed lists

      Reference content, such as the list of data domains (the major subject areas of an organization's data, such as riders, routes or fares), moves out of spreadsheets into a list with an owner for every row, so it can be governed and searched.

      Design review

      Comparing approaches with AI

      When I compare design approaches with AI, I keep what the evidence shows separate from what I recommend.

      Front door · invented exampleschematic

      Home

      where do I start?what are the rules?is my use safe?how do I learn it?where's the data?who can help?
      what's new
      DataAI

      Rules you found it here

      Data rulesAI rules

      Safe use

      Data safeguardsAI safeguards

      Skills links to safe use

      Data skillsAI skills
      Learning paths data and AI
      Reference list · spreadsheet to listschematic
      governedsearchable
      Design review
      AI comparison of approaches→what the evidence shows
      what I recommendmy call, kept separate

      AI fed the evidence. The recommendation stayed with me.

      Where it sends you

      A front door that points onward

      I want a front door to send people onward: to the right owner, the right page for their role and the right next step.

      Link to the source

      Owners keep their own content

      The front door links to guidance its owners maintain instead of copying it, so each owner keeps their own content current.

      The single-source principle: one canonical owner for each piece of guidance, linked rather than copied.

      Role-based next steps

      Start from your role

      Each role gets one page that points to what applies to it, and everyone gets a “start here”.

      From principle to action

      Every principle ends in a next step

      A page that states a principle ends with what it means for you, what to do, and who to ask, so nobody reaches a dead end at "be responsible".

      Link, don't copy
      Front doorlinks to →the owner's own guidance maintained by that owner

      copied guidance kept on the front door

      By role
      Everyone→“Start here” orientation
      Data stewards→Steward page
      People building with AI→Builder page
      From principle to action · schematic
      The principle
      What it means for you
      What to do
      Who to ask

      What this approach gives

      One starting point instead of several

      One place to start

      Every question has one first stop, and the two disciplines stay side by side there.

      Owners keep their content

      The front door links to what owners maintain, so nothing drifts out of date in two places.

      A check you can repeat

      The find-it task at the top is cheap to run with real menus before and after any merge.

      Consolidation isn't the goal in itself. In my experience, a single front door works when it's organized around the questions people actually arrive with.

      What it can claim

      What this story can support, and what it can't yet

      I graded these myself. Every claim is about this approach or this page, so you can check most of them from here.

      Claims register · 5 claims, and how well each is supported
      observed
      Visible on this page.
      document-supported
      Established by a public source, linked.
      inferred
      My professional judgement, not tested here.
      unresolved
      Not determinable from the available record.
      Claims register
      EvidenceClaimWhat supports it
      observedIn these invented menus, finding both halves takes at least seven clicks across the two old sites and two from the front door.The find-it test on this page.
      document-supportedA tree test measures how findable things are using the navigation alone, without visual design or search.MeasuringU, “Tree Testing”.
      inferredIn my practice, mapping every page before merging prevents accidental loss and duplication.My practice.
      inferredPaired data and AI pages connect the two disciplines without blending them.My practice.
      inferredIn my experience, a single front door works when it's organized around the questions people arrive with.My practice.

      Mine

      The approach, the invented example, the writing and the interactive pieces.

      Where I've practised it

      I've used this approach in enterprise intranet and knowledge-hub work.

      AI

      I build pages like this with AI assistants and check everything they produce.